USFP spec sheet

Every figure Cisco and NVIDIA have published for USFP, with its source, and the specifications nobody has published yet.

Cisco and NVIDIA announced design plans, not a finished specification, so this sheet has two halves: what they've said, and what a buyer or a system designer would need that hasn't been said yet. We update it when anything new appears.

Published figures

ItemUSFPSource
Full nameUltra-Dense Small Form Factor PluggableCisco
Electrical lane rate400 Gb/s per lane; also supports 200G-per-lane systemsCisco blog
Lanes, first design16 full-duplexCisco
Lanes, later32 or moreNVIDIA
Capacity per module6.4 Tb/s at 16 lanes; 12.8 Tb/s at 32 lanesCisco blog
Size"OSFP-sized" footprint; no drawings publishedCisco
HeatUp to 100 W without a dedicated embedded cooling circuitCisco
ConnectorTwo-dimensional contact array, two-step insertion, high-speed contacts engage after seatingCisco
Density claim4x the front-panel bandwidth density of 200G-per-lane pluggablesNVIDIA
Efficiency claimAbout 1.3x the power efficiency of 200G-per-lane pluggables (not independently measured)NAND Research
Optics"A broad range" of optical technologies and distances, including designs that simplify signal processingCisco
First productsSwitches and SuperNICs, Ethernet AI fabricsNVIDIA
PartnersTE Connectivity and Amphenol (cages, connectors, modules)Cisco
StandardPlanned open specification through a community-led multi-source agreementNVIDIA

About the 12.8T figure: the press release says customers "will be able to achieve 12.8Tb/s of overall capacity with USFP" without saying how. The Cisco blog post is clearer: 16 lanes give 6.4T, and scaling to 32 lanes gives 12.8T. Both numbers are one direction, the way the industry quotes a "1.6T" OSFP.

Not published yet

  • Mechanical drawings: exact width, height and length, and how many ports fit across a 1RU or OCP rack unit.
  • The connector's pin map, including how many contacts carry power and management.
  • Which Ethernet port types it carries (for example four 1.6T or two 3.2T per module) and the breakout options.
  • Optical interfaces and reach classes: which DR, FR, LR or SR variants, and the fiber connectors on the front.
  • Power classes below the 100 W ceiling, and the thermal test conditions.
  • Management interface (whether it uses CMIS, as OSFP and QSFP-DD do).
  • Whether any adapter will let OSFP modules work in USFP cages. Neither company has claimed it.
  • The MSA's name, members, licensing terms and publication date.
  • Sampling dates, ship dates and prices.

Analysts at NAND Research list port mappings, modulation, reach classes and qualification methods as the open items too (NAND Research).